pg.ddx.io  pgsql-committers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
pgsql: Ensure that "pg_restore -l" reports dependent TOC entries correc
6+ messages / 1 participants
[nested] [flat]

* pgsql: Ensure that "pg_restore -l" reports dependent TOC entries correc
@ 2024-05-07 22:23  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2024-05-07 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org

Ensure that "pg_restore -l" reports dependent TOC entries correctly.

If -l was specified together with selective-restore options such as -n
or -N, dependent TOC entries such as comments would be omitted from
the listing, even when an actual restore would have selected them.
This happened because PrintTOCSummary neglected to update the te->reqs
marking of the entry they depended on.

Per report from Justin Pryzby.  This has been wrong since 0d4e6ed30
taught _tocEntryRequired to sometimes look at the "reqs" marking of
other TOC entries, so back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZjoeirG7yxODdC4P@pryzbyj2023

Branch
------
REL_12_STABLE

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/a3c00ab1545029ee5d8c87d55da976ae1ccf2ba8

Modified Files
--------------
src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_archiver.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread

* pgsql: Ensure that "pg_restore -l" reports dependent TOC entries correc
@ 2024-05-07 22:23  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2024-05-07 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org

Ensure that "pg_restore -l" reports dependent TOC entries correctly.

If -l was specified together with selective-restore options such as -n
or -N, dependent TOC entries such as comments would be omitted from
the listing, even when an actual restore would have selected them.
This happened because PrintTOCSummary neglected to update the te->reqs
marking of the entry they depended on.

Per report from Justin Pryzby.  This has been wrong since 0d4e6ed30
taught _tocEntryRequired to sometimes look at the "reqs" marking of
other TOC entries, so back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZjoeirG7yxODdC4P@pryzbyj2023

Branch
------
REL_15_STABLE

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/6a458d93ba5f8d4b12db6a78d31ba2623e9cb594

Modified Files
--------------
src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_archiver.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread

* pgsql: Ensure that "pg_restore -l" reports dependent TOC entries correc
@ 2024-05-07 22:23  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2024-05-07 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org

Ensure that "pg_restore -l" reports dependent TOC entries correctly.

If -l was specified together with selective-restore options such as -n
or -N, dependent TOC entries such as comments would be omitted from
the listing, even when an actual restore would have selected them.
This happened because PrintTOCSummary neglected to update the te->reqs
marking of the entry they depended on.

Per report from Justin Pryzby.  This has been wrong since 0d4e6ed30
taught _tocEntryRequired to sometimes look at the "reqs" marking of
other TOC entries, so back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZjoeirG7yxODdC4P@pryzbyj2023

Branch
------
REL_14_STABLE

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/52b23b4e1c6f703a6617c027a5def99772af4ce4

Modified Files
--------------
src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_archiver.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread

* pgsql: Ensure that "pg_restore -l" reports dependent TOC entries correc
@ 2024-05-07 22:23  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2024-05-07 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org

Ensure that "pg_restore -l" reports dependent TOC entries correctly.

If -l was specified together with selective-restore options such as -n
or -N, dependent TOC entries such as comments would be omitted from
the listing, even when an actual restore would have selected them.
This happened because PrintTOCSummary neglected to update the te->reqs
marking of the entry they depended on.

Per report from Justin Pryzby.  This has been wrong since 0d4e6ed30
taught _tocEntryRequired to sometimes look at the "reqs" marking of
other TOC entries, so back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZjoeirG7yxODdC4P@pryzbyj2023

Branch
------
master

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/c1aea206e3e333b8c9f8be20422426ae845dd0cf

Modified Files
--------------
src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_archiver.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread

* pgsql: Ensure that "pg_restore -l" reports dependent TOC entries correc
@ 2024-05-07 22:23  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2024-05-07 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org

Ensure that "pg_restore -l" reports dependent TOC entries correctly.

If -l was specified together with selective-restore options such as -n
or -N, dependent TOC entries such as comments would be omitted from
the listing, even when an actual restore would have selected them.
This happened because PrintTOCSummary neglected to update the te->reqs
marking of the entry they depended on.

Per report from Justin Pryzby.  This has been wrong since 0d4e6ed30
taught _tocEntryRequired to sometimes look at the "reqs" marking of
other TOC entries, so back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZjoeirG7yxODdC4P@pryzbyj2023

Branch
------
REL_13_STABLE

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/b99dc6694ca64d8e5bd5ee2b0c6bdbbb8cdf4c99

Modified Files
--------------
src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_archiver.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread

* pgsql: Ensure that "pg_restore -l" reports dependent TOC entries correc
@ 2024-05-07 22:23  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2024-05-07 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org

Ensure that "pg_restore -l" reports dependent TOC entries correctly.

If -l was specified together with selective-restore options such as -n
or -N, dependent TOC entries such as comments would be omitted from
the listing, even when an actual restore would have selected them.
This happened because PrintTOCSummary neglected to update the te->reqs
marking of the entry they depended on.

Per report from Justin Pryzby.  This has been wrong since 0d4e6ed30
taught _tocEntryRequired to sometimes look at the "reqs" marking of
other TOC entries, so back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZjoeirG7yxODdC4P@pryzbyj2023

Branch
------
REL_16_STABLE

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/5dce8ce0ac48bc8af33d7efcdbfee713781598ed

Modified Files
--------------
src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_archiver.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-07 22:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-05-07 22:23 pgsql: Ensure that "pg_restore -l" reports dependent TOC entries correc Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2024-05-07 22:23 pgsql: Ensure that "pg_restore -l" reports dependent TOC entries correc Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2024-05-07 22:23 pgsql: Ensure that "pg_restore -l" reports dependent TOC entries correc Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2024-05-07 22:23 pgsql: Ensure that "pg_restore -l" reports dependent TOC entries correc Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2024-05-07 22:23 pgsql: Ensure that "pg_restore -l" reports dependent TOC entries correc Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2024-05-07 22:23 pgsql: Ensure that "pg_restore -l" reports dependent TOC entries correc Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox