From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
To: Pavel Luzanov <p.luzanov@postgrespro.ru>
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Correction for vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 08:45:23 +0200
Message-ID: <056c2150c6aed337c3ea7dfe3c57cb74e0399b54.camel@cybertec.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c71a3cfc-a267-3d9f-1b44-fbd668d0ab10@postgrespro.ru>
References: <c71a3cfc-a267-3d9f-1b44-fbd668d0ab10@postgrespro.ru>
On Tue, 2021-10-12 at 08:22 +0300, Pavel Luzanov wrote:
> When trying to make a link to the new vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age parameter,
> I found the wrong ID for this guc (missed word vacuum).
> Please consider this patch for a fix.
It is good to be consistent, but the name of the link is not essential, is it?
Changing it might break existing outside links.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: laurenz.albe@cybertec.at, p.luzanov@postgrespro.ru, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Correction for vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age
In-Reply-To: <056c2150c6aed337c3ea7dfe3c57cb74e0399b54.camel@cybertec.at>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox