pg.ddx.io pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archivehelp / color / mirror / Atom feed
37.10.3 3+ messages / 3 participants [nested] [flat]
Commits from this thread: 2020-03-13 dbf95c843a f393fb20a1 7e32aaab58 00f38866f7 Doc: fix mistaken reference to "PG_ARGNULL_xxx()" macro.
* 37.10.3 @ 2020-03-12 06:34 PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: PG Doc comments form @ 2020-03-12 06:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; +Cc: mrechte@gmail.com The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/xfunc-c.html Description: There is mention to macro PG_ARGNULL_xxx() which I cannot locate. Aren't you talking of PG_ARGISNULL(n) ? ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: 37.10.3 @ 2020-03-12 23:30 Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> parent: PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Laurenz Albe @ 2020-03-12 23:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mrechte@gmail.com; pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 06:34 +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote: > There is mention to macro PG_ARGNULL_xxx() which I cannot locate. Aren't you > talking of PG_ARGISNULL(n) ? Indeed. Here is a patch for that. Yours, Laurenz Albe Attachments:^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in threadPG_ARGISNULL.doc.patch (text/x-patch, 729B) download
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/xfunc.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/xfunc.sgml index d9afd3be4d..7c3cfb0115 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/xfunc.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/xfunc.sgml @@ -2241,7 +2241,7 @@ PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(funcname); <function>PG_GETARG_<replaceable>xxx</replaceable>()</function> macro that corresponds to the argument's data type. In non-strict functions there needs to be a previous check about argument null-ness - using <function>PG_ARGNULL_<replaceable>xxx</replaceable>()</function>. + using <function>PG_ARGISNULL_<replaceable>xxx</replaceable>()</function>. The result is returned using a <function>PG_RETURN_<replaceable>xxx</replaceable>()</function> macro for the return type.
* Re: 37.10.3 @ 2020-03-13 16:22 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> parent: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Tom Lane @ 2020-03-13 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>; +Cc: mrechte@gmail.com; pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> writes: > On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 06:34 +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote: >> There is mention to macro PG_ARGNULL_xxx() which I cannot locate. Aren't you >> talking of PG_ARGISNULL(n) ? > Indeed. Indeed :-(. > Here is a patch for that. Not quite right, it's just PG_ARGISNULL without any type-specific decoration. Will push in a moment. regards, tom lane ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-13 16:22 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-03-12 06:34 37.10.3 PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> 2020-03-12 23:30 ` Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> 2020-03-13 16:22 ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox