From: Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Doc <synopsis> changes
Date: 28 Feb 2003 08:35:36 -0500
Message-ID: <1046439335.18250.102.camel@jester> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302281342040.2188-100000@peter.localdomain>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302281342040.2188-100000@peter.localdomain>
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 07:43, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Rod Taylor writes:
>
> > Anyway, I think it looks as good as the old version did -- but could be
> > wrong ;) Any further suggestions?
>
> I think the cmdsynopsis element is fundamentally unsuitable for SQL
> commands, because their syntax isn't simply command + arguments.
Hmm.. wish you would have said that the first time. Anyway, I've
accomplished what I was asked to, so I'll leave it at that.
Thanks for your thoughts.
--
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.ascAttachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 186B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: rbt@rbt.ca, peter_e@gmx.net
Subject: Re: Doc <synopsis> changes
In-Reply-To: <1046439335.18250.102.camel@jester>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox