pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>
Cc: Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
Date: 04 Jul 2003 19:29:38 +0000
Message-ID: <1057346977.40425.108.camel@jester> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4395.1057346323@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <20030704152620.GA4707@libertyrms.info>
	<005001c34257$1f461360$3ac15e91@acm>
	<20030704182853.GK4707@libertyrms.info>
	<200307041137.59148.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<4395.1057346323@sss.pgh.pa.us>

> I am about to propose a patch that will cause the default shared_buffers
> to be more realistic, say 1000, on machines where the kernel will allow
> it.  Not sure if people will let me get away with applying it
> post-feature-freeze, but if so that would change the terms of this
> debate noticeably.

It's not a feature change, it's a bug fix -- bug being an oversight.

Attachments:

  signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 186B) download

view thread (65+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1057346977.40425.108.camel@jester>
Permalink:  ../1057346977.40425.108.camel@jester/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1057346977.40425.108.camel@jester

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: rbt@rbt.ca, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, josh@agliodbs.com, andrew@libertyrms.info, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
  In-Reply-To: <1057346977.40425.108.camel@jester>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox