From: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: minor documentation improvements
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 19:24:29 -0400
Message-ID: <1062804269.354.4.camel@tokyo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309052312060.1173-100000@peter.localdomain>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309052312060.1173-100000@peter.localdomain>
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 17:16, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Currently, the documentation contains about 2 GUC variable names in upper
> case, the rest is lower case.
There are significantly more than 2 uses of upper-case GUC names in the
docs (more like 10 by my guess), but in any case, the current usage is
inconsistent.
So, is upper-case or lower-case better? I'd personally prefer
lower-case, I suppose, but I'm not too bothered either way.
-Neil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: neilc@samurai.com, peter_e@gmx.net, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: minor documentation improvements
In-Reply-To: <1062804269.354.4.camel@tokyo>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox