From: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SQL 2003 conformance
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:10:24 +1000
Message-ID: <1098061824.22986.91.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200410121952.24859.peter_e@gmx.net>
References: <200410121952.24859.peter_e@gmx.net>
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 03:52, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Is anyone feeling masochistic and wants to review the SQL standards
> conformance chapter in the documentation for SQL 2003?
Another useful improvement would be to update the "Standards
conformance" section of the SQL command reference pages to refer to
SQL:2003 consistently. At present they refer to a mix of SQL-92,
SQL:1999, and SQL:2003.
-Neil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: neilc@samurai.com, peter_e@gmx.net
Subject: Re: SQL 2003 conformance
In-Reply-To: <1098061824.22986.91.camel@localhost.localdomain>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox