From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 19:55:16 +0100
Message-ID: <1145127316.3273.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200604151624.k3FGOj525540@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <200604151624.k3FGOj525540@candle.pha.pa.us>
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 12:24 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> And if we can't provide one, should we supply an SQL function
> to return the current WAL name?
I'll do this. Just give me a few days to get my feet under the new desk.
I know its well past time I sorted this and a few other things out.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: simon@2ndquadrant.com, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, dev@archonet.com
Subject: Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
In-Reply-To: <1145127316.3273.12.camel@localhost.localdomain>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox