From: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Autovacuum and XID wraparound
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 00:34:29 -0400
Message-ID: <1179117269.6047.3.camel@goldbach> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23394.1179108400@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <20070514011740.GH14860@fetter.org>
<23394.1179108400@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On Sun, 2007-13-05 at 22:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> This fact is already documented in at least three places; do we really
> need two more?
I think we need to at least modify the documentation for the autovacuum
GUC parameter, which currently states only that it "controls whether the
server should run the autovacuum launcher daemon" -- this is not
strictly true, and in any case, it isn't the whole story.
> The proposed addition to postgresql.conf seems particularly
> over-the-top
I agree that this information doesn't really belong in postgresql.conf.
-Neil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: neilc@samurai.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, david@fetter.org, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Autovacuum and XID wraparound
In-Reply-To: <1179117269.6047.3.camel@goldbach>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox