From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org, Mija Lee <mija@scharp.org>
Subject: Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 19:54:48 +0100
Message-ID: <1191264888.4260.69.camel@ebony.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1191263814.4260.57.camel@ebony.site>
References: <25517.1191038302@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<47012AC5.9040808@agliodbs.com>
<1191263814.4260.57.camel@ebony.site>
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 19:36 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > I *do* think it's an accurate statement that if you're going to use
> > Postgres, or any other OLTP database, on NFS you'd better have access to
> > a NAS expert. But to say that it's a bad idea even if you have expert
> > help is probably going to far.
>
> I can see many papers on database performance on NFS, but I don't see
> any discussion of potential reliability concerns. If anybody sits near
> an NAS expert, it would be great to have that discussion.
http://blogs.netapp.com/dave/2007/08/oracle-optimize.html
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: simon@2ndquadrant.com, josh@agliodbs.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, mija@scharp.org
Subject: Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
In-Reply-To: <1191264888.4260.69.camel@ebony.site>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox