pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: outdated legal notice in SGML docs?
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:16:41 +0300
Message-ID: <1340140601.26286.28.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB56426.7050409@kaltenbrunner.cc>
References: <4FB56426.7050409@kaltenbrunner.cc>

On tor, 2012-05-17 at 16:48 -0400, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> While working on automating our PDF doc building for the website I
> noticed that we seem to ship with outdated legal information in the docs.
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/licence/
> 
> (this also matches up with:
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob_plain;f=COPYRIGHT;hb=HEAD)
> 
> seems to be our current licence text - however in the SGML docs we
> actually have(pointer to the html generated source here):
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/LEGALNOTICE.html
> 
> which is differing in subtile ways (not mentioning the postgresql
> licence but rather refering to a "licence from the university of
> california") and also having different copyright year references/texts.

I removed the extra half sentence about the "license from the
university ...", which didn't really serve any purpose.  I think the
rest is fine.  The copyright notices don't need to be spelled exactly
the same, I think.

I think the COPYRIGHT file is wrong in that it claims UCB copyright only
until 1994.

> This seems to be wrong in all branches and has the additional problem
> that the Copyright year on the backbranches is always out-of-date - for
> example:
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/LEGALNOTICE.html
> 
> will have 2009 for 8.4.11 which was released in 2012...
> 
> any thoughts on what the correct way to fix this is?

I've fixed this in all the active back branches.  The copyright tool in
src/tools/ does inform about doing these changes, but whoever does them
has apparently not read that.





view thread (6+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1340140601.26286.28.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
Permalink:  ../1340140601.26286.28.camel@vanquo.pezone.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1340140601.26286.28.camel@vanquo.pezone.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: peter_e@gmx.net, stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc
  Subject: Re: outdated legal notice in SGML docs?
  In-Reply-To: <1340140601.26286.28.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox