public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
To: Ian Lawrence Barwick <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: pgsql-docs <[email protected]>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Contrib module "xml2" status
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 15:46:37 -0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB8KJ=gXZtmEQUwcW5z0uTETncYsxr6WuaGd7QNqbsQ+-bRDfQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAB8KJ=jzPCM2BT8KcoNnydzPFk-rMvKWP99WNXegW3bWaeu7pw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+TgmoZkD+HVkNTEHLUKMwVB79_yTLk40v-ve=QSyugaLJh2sQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABUevEyPUp6aP2svQmvCUHBN=_2pqA+JobrdLqWCHHj1+fbwkg@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAB8KJ=gXZtmEQUwcW5z0uTETncYsxr6WuaGd7QNqbsQ+-bRDfQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>

On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 08:25 +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
> 2013/2/22 Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]>:
> >
> > On 02/21/2013 12:56 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Robert Haas <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Ian Lawrence Barwick
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm not sure if this is a documentation or hackers issue, but the
> >>>> documentation page for contrib module "xml2" refers to PostgreSQL 8.4 in
> >>>> the
> >>>> future tense:
> >>>>
> >>>>     "It is planned that this module will be removed in PostgreSQL 8.4 in
> >>>> favor of the newer standard API"
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/xml2.html
> >>>>
> >>>> Are there any plans to remove this module by a forseeable date?
> >>>
> >>> Nope.  I have repeatedly been voted down on removing it, and I've also
> >>> been repeatedly voted down on removing the deprecation text.  Could we
> >>> at least agree on changing the deprecation text to say "This module is
> >>> deprecated and may be removed in a future release"?
> >>
> >> Not reopening the actual discussion about rmeoving it, but assuming
> >> we're not, strong +1 on changing the deprecation message. And don't
> >> forget to backpatch the change so it shows up in the old versions of
> >> the docs as well.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Yes, we should change it to remove the reference to 8.4.
> 
> Documentation patch attached.

done



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

view thread (8+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [DOCS] Contrib module "xml2" status
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox