public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
small fixes for REINDEX doc page
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* small fixes for REINDEX doc page
@ 2014-07-11 01:13 Josh Kupershmidt <[email protected]>
  2014-07-15 01:10 ` Re: small fixes for REINDEX doc page Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread

From: Josh Kupershmidt @ 2014-07-11 01:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-docs

Hi all,

Attached are two small fixes for the REINDEX page. The first change
should be a straightforward typofix, and for the second change "takes
an exclusive lock" sounds better and is more consistent with the rest
of our documentation's phrasing than "takes exclusive lock".

Josh

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/reindex.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/reindex.sgml
index 3dfaef4..cabae19 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/reindex.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/reindex.sgml
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ REINDEX { INDEX | TABLE | DATABASE | SYSTEM } <replaceable class="PARAMETER">nam
 
     <listitem>
      <para>
-      An index has become <quote>bloated</>, that it is contains many
+      An index has become <quote>bloated</>, that is it contains many
       empty or nearly-empty pages.  This can occur with B-tree indexes in
       <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> under certain uncommon access
       patterns. <command>REINDEX</command> provides a way to reduce
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ REINDEX { INDEX | TABLE | DATABASE | SYSTEM } <replaceable class="PARAMETER">nam
    but not reads of the index's parent table.  It also takes an exclusive lock
    on the specific index being processed, which will block reads that attempt
    to use that index.  In contrast, <command>DROP INDEX</> momentarily takes
-   exclusive lock on the parent table, blocking both writes and reads.  The
+   an exclusive lock on the parent table, blocking both writes and reads.  The
    subsequent <command>CREATE INDEX</> locks out writes but not reads; since
    the index is not there, no read will attempt to use it, meaning that there
    will be no blocking but reads might be forced into expensive sequential


-- 
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs


Attachments:

  [text/plain] reindex_doc_fixes.diff (1.4K, 2-reindex_doc_fixes.diff)
  download | inline diff:
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/reindex.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/reindex.sgml
index 3dfaef4..cabae19 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/reindex.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/reindex.sgml
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ REINDEX { INDEX | TABLE | DATABASE | SYSTEM } <replaceable class="PARAMETER">nam
 
     <listitem>
      <para>
-      An index has become <quote>bloated</>, that it is contains many
+      An index has become <quote>bloated</>, that is it contains many
       empty or nearly-empty pages.  This can occur with B-tree indexes in
       <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> under certain uncommon access
       patterns. <command>REINDEX</command> provides a way to reduce
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ REINDEX { INDEX | TABLE | DATABASE | SYSTEM } <replaceable class="PARAMETER">nam
    but not reads of the index's parent table.  It also takes an exclusive lock
    on the specific index being processed, which will block reads that attempt
    to use that index.  In contrast, <command>DROP INDEX</> momentarily takes
-   exclusive lock on the parent table, blocking both writes and reads.  The
+   an exclusive lock on the parent table, blocking both writes and reads.  The
    subsequent <command>CREATE INDEX</> locks out writes but not reads; since
    the index is not there, no read will attempt to use it, meaning that there
    will be no blocking but reads might be forced into expensive sequential


^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: small fixes for REINDEX doc page
  2014-07-11 01:13 small fixes for REINDEX doc page Josh Kupershmidt <[email protected]>
@ 2014-07-15 01:10 ` Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread

From: Peter Eisentraut @ 2014-07-15 01:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Josh Kupershmidt <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-docs


On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 21:13 -0400, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> Attached are two small fixes for the REINDEX page. The first change
> should be a straightforward typofix, and for the second change "takes
> an exclusive lock" sounds better and is more consistent with the rest
> of our documentation's phrasing than "takes exclusive lock".

committed





-- 
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2014-07-15 01:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-07-11 01:13 small fixes for REINDEX doc page Josh Kupershmidt <[email protected]>
2014-07-15 01:10 ` Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox