pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
PATH no longer a part of 7.4?
7+ messages / 3 participants
[nested] [flat]

* PATH no longer a part of 7.4?
@ 2004-02-10 14:38  Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread

From: Dan Langille @ 2004-02-10 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-docs

The Geometric data types listed at 
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/datatype-geometric.html 
include a data type known as "path".  I do not see this data type in 
my 7.4 installation.

Which is wrong?  The documentation or the code?

Cheers
-- 
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
BSDCan - http://www.bsdcan.org/




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: PATH no longer a part of 7.4?
@ 2004-02-10 15:09  Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
  parent: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread

From: Bruce Momjian @ 2004-02-10 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>; +Cc: pgsql-docs

Dan Langille wrote:
> The Geometric data types listed at 
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/datatype-geometric.html 
> include a data type known as "path".  I do not see this data type in 
> my 7.4 installation.
> 
> Which is wrong?  The documentation or the code?

It is in CVS:
	
	test=> \dT path
	                List of data types
	   Schema   |  Name  |        Description
	------------+--------+----------------------------
	 pg_catalog | "path" | geometric path '(pt1,...)'
	(1 row)


-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: PATH no longer a part of 7.4?
@ 2004-02-10 15:35  Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>
  parent: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>
  2 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread

From: Dan Langille @ 2004-02-10 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; +Cc: pgsql-docs

On 10 Feb 2004 at 10:09, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Dan Langille wrote:
> > The Geometric data types listed at 
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/datatype-geometric.html 
> > include a data type known as "path".  I do not see this data type in 
> > my 7.4 installation.
> > 
> > Which is wrong?  The documentation or the code?
> 
> It is in CVS:
> 	
> 	test=> \dT path
> 	                List of data types
> 	   Schema   |  Name  |        Description
> 	------------+--------+----------------------------
> 	 pg_catalog | "path" | geometric path '(pt1,...)'
> 	(1 row)

Ahhh yes, sorry, I was looking further down in the output of \dt 
instead of at the top where they appear in "quotes".  Thank you.

Here is how this issue arose.  A user of:

Suse SLES 8 (aka UnitedLinux 1.0), Postgres 7.2.4 according to the 
docs, however:

                                version
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
 PostgreSQL 7.2.2 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 
3.2.2

Is getting this error when creating a table named path.  I'm waiting 
for details on the exact create statement, but given the application 
<http://www.bacula.org/;, I suspect it is this:

create table path
(
    pathid            serial                not null,
    path              text                  not null,
    primary key (pathid)
);

The error he is getting is:

psql:<stdin>:34: NOTICE:  CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence 
'path_pathid_seq' for SERIAL column 'path.pathid'
psql:<stdin>:34: NOTICE:  CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create 
implicit 
index 'path_pkey' for table 'path'
psql:<stdin>:34: ERROR:  type named path already exists

We're confused.

I've been able to create this table under 7.4.1, 7.4, and 7.3.4 (but 
have no other versions under which I can test).

Thanks
-- 
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
BSDCan - http://www.bsdcan.org/




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: PATH no longer a part of 7.4?
@ 2004-02-10 15:42  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  parent: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2004-02-10 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>; +Cc: pgsql-docs

"Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> writes:
> The Geometric data types listed at 
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/datatype-geometric.html 
> include a data type known as "path".  I do not see this data type in 
> my 7.4 installation.

You don't?

regression=# select * from pg_type where typname = 'path';
 typname | typnamespace | typowner | typlen | typbyval | typtype | typisdefined | typdelim | typrelid | typelem | typinput | typoutput | typreceive |  typsend | typalign | typstorage | typnotnull | typbasetype | typtypmod | typndims | typdefaultbin | typdefault
---------+--------------+----------+--------+----------+---------+--------------+----------+----------+---------+----------+-----------+------------+-----------+----------+------------+------------+-------------+-----------+----------+---------------+------------
 path    |           11 |        1 |     -1 | f        | b       | t            | ,        |        0 |       0 | path_in  | path_out  | path_recv  | path_send | d        | x          | f          |           0 |        -1 |        0 |              |
(1 row)

			regards, tom lane



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: PATH no longer a part of 7.4?
@ 2004-02-10 16:32  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  parent: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2004-02-10 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>; +Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; pgsql-docs

"Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> writes:
> Here is how this issue arose.  A user of [ 7.2.something ]
> is getting this error when creating a table named path.

Right, in 7.2 the rowtype for such a table would conflict with the
predefined type.

> I've been able to create this table under 7.4.1, 7.4, and 7.3.4 (but 
> have no other versions under which I can test).

In 7.3 and later there is no conflict, because the predefined type name
lives in the pg_catalog schema, which is not where user tables are
customarily created.

			regards, tom lane



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: PATH no longer a part of 7.4?
@ 2004-02-10 16:38  Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>
  parent: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread

From: Dan Langille @ 2004-02-10 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; +Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; pgsql-docs

On 10 Feb 2004 at 11:32, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> writes:
> > Here is how this issue arose.  A user of [ 7.2.something ]
> > is getting this error when creating a table named path.
> 
> Right, in 7.2 the rowtype for such a table would conflict with the
> predefined type.
> 
> > I've been able to create this table under 7.4.1, 7.4, and 7.3.4 (but 
> > have no other versions under which I can test).
> 
> In 7.3 and later there is no conflict, because the predefined type name
> lives in the pg_catalog schema, which is not where user tables are
> customarily created.

Hmmm, for a 7.2 user, is there any solution?  Apart from "drop type 
path"?  We'd rather not rename the table.
-- 
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
BSDCan - http://www.bsdcan.org/




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: PATH no longer a part of 7.4?
@ 2004-02-10 16:45  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  parent: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2004-02-10 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>; +Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; pgsql-docs

"Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> writes:
> Hmmm, for a 7.2 user, is there any solution?  Apart from "drop type 
> path"?  We'd rather not rename the table.

Upgrade, or rename the path type to something else.  (Not sure if there
are any bad consequences of renaming the path type.  It'd probably be a
bad idea to do so if the database is making any actual use of the path
type, just because of potential confusion.)

			regards, tom lane



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-10 16:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-02-10 14:38 PATH no longer a part of 7.4? Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>
2004-02-10 15:09 ` Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
2004-02-10 15:35 ` Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>
2004-02-10 16:32   ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2004-02-10 16:38   ` Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>
2004-02-10 16:45     ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2004-02-10 15:42 ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox