From: PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: nico.lichtmaier@gmail.com
Subject: Isn't "publication" wrongly defined here?
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 18:48:53 +0000
Message-ID: <152485493360.19803.15458021985994949783@wrigleys.postgresql.org> (raw)
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/logical-replication-publication.html
Description:
In section 31.1 it says "A publication is a set of changes generated from a
table or a group of tables"... that seems wrong. It's a set of relations,
tables, whatevers. No the changes themselves. Right?
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: noreply@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, nico.lichtmaier@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Isn't "publication" wrongly defined here?
In-Reply-To: <152485493360.19803.15458021985994949783@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox