From: PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: ehansmair@prompt-software.de
Subject: Documentation 9.8. Data Type Formatting Functions: missing behaviour on invalid input at to_date()
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 11:16:59 +0000
Message-ID: <159135581922.7031.8149548798892105892@wrigleys.postgresql.org> (raw)
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/functions-formatting.html
Description:
For the formatting functions, which convert between a string and a type like
date, timestamp or number, there should be a description about the behaviour
of i.e. to_date(input, mask) in case of invalid, not convertable input.
I expected a return value of NULL and got a execution error.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: noreply@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, ehansmair@prompt-software.de
Subject: Re: Documentation 9.8. Data Type Formatting Functions: missing behaviour on invalid input at to_date()
In-Reply-To: <159135581922.7031.8149548798892105892@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox