From: PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: drlaz@me.com
Subject: serial attribute type vs GENERATED AS IDENTITY
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 01:16:00 +0000
Message-ID: <159209736068.673.8013661179955602448@wrigleys.postgresql.org> (raw)
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/datatype-numeric.html
Description:
I think the documentation should mention that these do much the same thing
(at least, for the default auto-incrementing integer sequence). Using both
on the same column is, sensibly, not allowed.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: noreply@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, drlaz@me.com
Subject: Re: serial attribute type vs GENERATED AS IDENTITY
In-Reply-To: <159209736068.673.8013661179955602448@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox