From: PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: abo@velvica.com
Subject: Possible mistake in backup documentation
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:17:40 +0000
Message-ID: <160078426053.14061.808669930112439771@wrigleys.postgresql.org> (raw)
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/wal.html
Description:
Hello!
In "25.3.3.2. Making An Exclusive Low-Level Backup", you said that "The
exclusive backup method is deprecated and should be avoided. Prior to
PostgreSQL 9.6, this was the only low-level method available, but it is now
recommended that all users upgrade their scripts to use non-exclusive
backups". But in the example in "25.3.6.1. Standalone Hot Backups" you use
the exclusive version of backup command. Is it a mistake or not?
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: noreply@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, abo@velvica.com
Subject: Re: Possible mistake in backup documentation
In-Reply-To: <160078426053.14061.808669930112439771@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox