From: PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: willybas@gmail.com
Subject: physical should be logical
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 15:28:02 +0000
Message-ID: <160381248299.24751.16203672226094409778@wrigleys.postgresql.org> (raw)
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/logical-replication-publication.html
Description:
Hi,
On this page,
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/logical-replication-publication.html
The first line states: A publication can be defined on any physical
replication master.
I have the impression that this should be "logical", not "physical".
Cheers,
Willy-Bas Loos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: noreply@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, willybas@gmail.com
Subject: Re: physical should be logical
In-Reply-To: <160381248299.24751.16203672226094409778@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox