From: PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: tristan.chambers@gmail.com
Subject: Explicit or implicit?
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 16:12:25 +0000
Message-ID: <163742474559.26193.12547875443867026853@wrigleys.postgresql.org> (raw)
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/textsearch-intro.html
Description:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/textsearch-intro.html
"The @@ operator also supports text input, allowing explicit conversion of a
text string to tsvector or tsquery to be skipped in simple cases."I believe
that the text is saying implicit, but uses the word "explicit" instead. Is
this a typo? Thanks.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: noreply@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, tristan.chambers@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Explicit or implicit?
In-Reply-To: <163742474559.26193.12547875443867026853@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox