From: PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: rishabh_mehrotra@discovery.com
Subject: More explanation on comparison
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 15:51:39 +0000
Message-ID: <163837389965.1261.5347235431976750914@wrigleys.postgresql.org> (raw)
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/postgres-fdw.html
Description:
In the following doc:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/postgres-fdw.html
it is mentioned that
"postgres_fdw provides more transparent and standards-compliant syntax for
accessing remote tables, and can give better performance in many cases."
Can we get some examples for this?
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: noreply@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, rishabh_mehrotra@discovery.com
Subject: Re: More explanation on comparison
In-Reply-To: <163837389965.1261.5347235431976750914@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox