From: PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: vasiliauskas.mg@gmail.com
Subject: 5.11.1 Table Partitioning Overview - "...the size of the table should exceed the physical memory.."
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 05:06:58 +0000
Message-ID: <168542321808.1230020.11749247868403452374@wrigleys.postgresql.org> (raw)
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/ddl-partitioning.html
Description:
Is this rule of thumb a typo?
"The exact point at which a table will benefit from partitioning depends on
the application, although a rule of thumb is that the size of the table
should exceed the physical memory of the database server."
I believe it should say the "a rule of thumb is that the size of the table
should NOT exceed the physical memory of the database server."
Thanks,
MV
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: noreply@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, vasiliauskas.mg@gmail.com
Subject: Re: 5.11.1 Table Partitioning Overview - "...the size of the table should exceed the physical memory.."
In-Reply-To: <168542321808.1230020.11749247868403452374@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox