pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: elkzwix@gmail.com
Subject: Discrepancy between the documentation and the implementation
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 15:20:11 +0000
Message-ID: <169824721149.1769274.1553568436817652238@wrigleys.postgresql.org> (raw)

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/ecpg-sql-set-connection.html
Description:

In the documentation for Postgres 15, on page
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/ecpg-sql-set-connection.html, it states
that one can write:

SET CONNECTION connection_name

And under that, it talks about "connection_name" and DEFAULT, which is
supposed to be used in order to use the "default connection".
However, "SET CONNECTION DEFAULT" is treated by ECPG as a normal connection
name (looking for a connection named "DEFAULT"), not as a special keyword
meaning to go back to using the "default" connection.

Is there something I'm missing there ?  The documentation is kinda
misleading, in its current form. Or is there a limitation with ECPG, which
prevents the use of DEFAULT, while it would work with other tools ?

(This is written in the same way for numerous Postgres versions, it's not
limited to version 15)

Regards,
Sylvain FRANDAZ


view thread (2+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <169824721149.1769274.1553568436817652238@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
Permalink:  ../169824721149.1769274.1553568436817652238@wrigleys.postgresql.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/169824721149.1769274.1553568436817652238@wrigleys.postgresql.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: noreply@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, elkzwix@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Discrepancy between the documentation and the implementation
  In-Reply-To: <169824721149.1769274.1553568436817652238@wrigleys.postgresql.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox