From: PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: dilerie01@gmail.com
Subject: Grammar suggestion
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 13:31:36 +0000
Message-ID: <170472069665.664.18333923743276806522@wrigleys.postgresql.org> (raw)
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/ddl-constraints.html
Description:
Dear postgres Team,
I happened to have stumbled across a tricky to read sentence in Ch. 5.45
'Foreign Keys' (Postgres Version 15).
The original sentence: "Normally, a referencing row need not satisfy the
foreign key constraint if any of its referencing columns are null".
Here's the revised version: "Normally, a referencing row does not need to
satisfy the foreign key constraint if any of its referencing columns are
null."
A bit restructuring in beginning of this sentence can it make it
grammatically complete and clear for the reader.
Kindly yours,
Sayed Dileri.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: noreply@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, dilerie01@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Grammar suggestion
In-Reply-To: <170472069665.664.18333923743276806522@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox