From: PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: splarv@ya.ru
Subject: May be not exclusive locks, but access exclusive locks?
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 07:27:03 +0000
Message-ID: <172483002385.862886.14254882146229741435@wrigleys.postgresql.org> (raw)
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/app-pgdump.html
Description:
Cite
Requesting exclusive locks on database objects while running a parallel dump
could cause the dump to fail.
End cite
As far as I can understand the problem of deadlocks will be not with
exclusive locks, but with access exclusive locks.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: noreply@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, splarv@ya.ru
Subject: Re: May be not exclusive locks, but access exclusive locks?
In-Reply-To: <172483002385.862886.14254882146229741435@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox