From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Operators and Functions
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 18:01:08 -0500
Message-ID: <18165.976489268@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0012102152210.1095-100000@peter.localdomain>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0012102152210.1095-100000@peter.localdomain>
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> ... the division between functions and operators is quite unnatural.
Agreed --- especially seeing as how every operator has an underlying
function.
> I'd envision merging the information into one chapter with the following
> outline:
Seems reasonable to me.
BTW, this may be more work than you want to do right now, but ISTM that
the "example" columns in those tables would be lots more useful if the
result of the example were shown too. I did that for the network
functions already, but haven't got round to working on the rest.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, peter_e@gmx.net
Subject: Re: Operators and Functions
In-Reply-To: <18165.976489268@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox