From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org, pgsql-novice@postgreSQL.org, Mija Lee <mija@scharp.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:24:41 -0400
Message-ID: <18214.1191259481@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47012AC5.9040808@agliodbs.com>
References: <25517.1191038302@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<47012AC5.9040808@agliodbs.com>
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>> Maybe we need to actively discourage people from running Postgres
>> against NFS-mounted data directories.
> It's hard to reconcile this with the real-world performance of
> PostgreSQL on NFS, which is happening all over the place. Most notably,
> Joe Conway's 20,000 txn/sec.
This is not a question of performance, it is a question of whether you
are willing to tolerate corner-case misbehaviors.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, josh@agliodbs.com, mija@scharp.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
In-Reply-To: <18214.1191259481@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox