pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc: D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Announce: Release of PyGreSQL version 3.0
Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 23:38:32 -0400
Message-ID: <19712.970976312@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010072112560.1627-100000@thelab.hub.org>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010072112560.1627-100000@thelab.hub.org>

The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
>> darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain) writes:
>>>> When is 7.1 being locked down?  I may be releasing 3.1 with a few small
>>>> fixes and changes very soon.
>> 
>> You've probably got about 2 weeks before beta starts.  Bug fixes are
>> accepted during beta freeze, of course --- just no new-feature
>> development.

> how are we dealing with third party software like this though?  Stuff like
> PyGreSQL and PGAccess should be "at the authors discretion", no?  As they
> don't interfere with the core functionality and build of the system?

Well, a third party author always has the option to release his code
separately on whatever timeline seems good to him.  But I think that for
third-party code included in the distribution, the same standards ought
to apply as for the Postgres code itself: we don't want people sticking
alpha-quality code into a Postgres release tarball, whether it's core
functionality or not.  It's not as if "no new features for a month" is
a particularly onerous standard to meet ;-)

			regards, tom lane



view thread (12+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <19712.970976312@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../19712.970976312@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/19712.970976312@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, scrappy@hub.org, darcy@druid.net, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Announce: Release of PyGreSQL version 3.0
  In-Reply-To: <19712.970976312@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox