pg.ddx.io pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedDocs after split
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]
* Docs after split
@ 2000-05-27 03:30 Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Momjian @ 2000-05-27 03:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas G. Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>; +Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <docs@postgresql.org>
Thomas, now that there is a 7.0 split, do you want to keep both cvs
trees up-to-date, or just keep current up-to-date?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Docs after split
@ 2000-05-31 02:18 Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
parent: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Lockhart @ 2000-05-31 02:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; +Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <docs@postgresql.org>
> Thomas, now that there is a 7.0 split, do you want to keep both cvs
> trees up-to-date, or just keep current up-to-date?
current should be supported for sure. Haven't bothered with the stable
tree, since it could lead to a large increase in work.
istm that we *could* update the stable branch at the last minute by
diffing two trees.
- Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-05-31 02:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-05-27 03:30 Docs after split Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
2000-05-31 02:18 ` Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox