pg.ddx.io pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedRe: Section numbering
3+ messages / 3 participants
[nested] [flat]
* Section numbering
@ 2001-02-19 18:03 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
2001-02-19 18:02 ` Re: Section numbering Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
2001-02-20 04:51 ` Re: Section numbering Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Eisentraut @ 2001-02-19 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-docs
Does anyone mind if I turn on section numbering? I.e., instead of
9. Multi-Version Concurrency Control
Introduction
Transaction Isolation
Read Committed Isolation Level
Serializable Isolation Level
Data consistency checks at the application level
Locking and Tables
Table-level locks
Row-level locks
Locking and Indices
We'd have
9. Multi-Version Concurrency Control
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Transaction Isolation
9.3 Read Committed Isolation Level
9.4 Serializable Isolation Level
9.5 Data consistency checks at the application level
9.6 Locking and Tables
9.6.1 Table-level locks
9.6.2 Row-level locks
9.7 Locking and Indices
This makes for easier reference, and the cross-reference links look a lot
less tacky (no longer "see the section called "Locking and Indices").
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Section numbering
2001-02-19 18:03 Section numbering Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
@ 2001-02-19 18:02 ` Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Momjian @ 2001-02-19 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>; +Cc: pgsql-docs
Numbers Look good to me.
> Does anyone mind if I turn on section numbering? I.e., instead of
>
> 9. Multi-Version Concurrency Control
> Introduction
> Transaction Isolation
> Read Committed Isolation Level
> Serializable Isolation Level
> Data consistency checks at the application level
> Locking and Tables
> Table-level locks
> Row-level locks
> Locking and Indices
>
> We'd have
>
> 9. Multi-Version Concurrency Control
> 9.1 Introduction
> 9.2 Transaction Isolation
> 9.3 Read Committed Isolation Level
> 9.4 Serializable Isolation Level
> 9.5 Data consistency checks at the application level
> 9.6 Locking and Tables
> 9.6.1 Table-level locks
> 9.6.2 Row-level locks
> 9.7 Locking and Indices
>
> This makes for easier reference, and the cross-reference links look a lot
> less tacky (no longer "see the section called "Locking and Indices").
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
>
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Section numbering
2001-02-19 18:03 Section numbering Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
@ 2001-02-20 04:51 ` Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Lockhart @ 2001-02-20 04:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>; +Cc: pgsql-docs
> Does anyone mind if I turn on section numbering? I.e., instead of
Let's try it. Not sure what that does when trying to regenerate ToC for
hardcopy, but we'll see...
- Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-02-20 04:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-02-19 18:03 Section numbering Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
2001-02-19 18:02 ` Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
2001-02-20 04:51 ` Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox