pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Default shared memory SGML mention
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 16:23:22 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <200105082023.f48KNMm28570@candle.pha.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7901.989353074@sss.pgh.pa.us>

> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > far as -N, buffers is always 2*N, right, so I figured it was in there
> > already.
> 
> No, it isn't, and buffers is NOT always 2*N.

Yes, but shared memory limits are based on buffers, not connections,
right?  The per-connection overhead is pretty small, no?

If it is buffers and connections, how much is connections and how much
buffers.  I know buffers is 8k.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026



view thread (10+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <200105082023.f48KNMm28570@candle.pha.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../200105082023.f48KNMm28570@candle.pha.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/200105082023.f48KNMm28570@candle.pha.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
  Subject: Re: Default shared memory SGML mention
  In-Reply-To: <200105082023.f48KNMm28570@candle.pha.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox