pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>
Cc: Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 23:40:09 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <20011001233901.M77860-100000@mail1.hub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200110011858.f91IwxH15681@candle.pha.pa.us>

On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > > <li><a href="http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml">SGML docs
> > > updated every half-hour</a>
> >
> > Ya know, if I'm required to wait 12 hours for *any* source code build to
> > be available to my CVSup'd repository, why should we slap in a bunch of
> > short circuits for the docs? And if this is a valuable thing to do, why
> > short circuit the docs building procedure I've already got on the main
> > machines by pointing the web site off to some other machine?
> >
> > fwiw, one docs building procedure, either ~thomas's, or ~petere's new
> > one, or ~bruce's should be sufficient imho.
> >
> > Since we all seem to be heading off in different directions, we should
> > talk about why that is necessary and try to get headed somewhere
> > productively imho.
>
> I did it because the doc build was down and it was supposedly holding up
> beta.  I do think we need more frequent doc builds than 24 hours though.

Since when doe sa doc build, or docs of any kind, hold up beta?  docs are
'fluid' up until a week before release,as they have always been ...

last I heard from petere, there were tools that need to be installed, and
were installed, ont eh server for the builds ... Peter, did I miss
something in that, or was it just waiting for ftp.postgresql.org to be on
the new server?






view thread (70+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20011001233901.M77860-100000@mail1.hub.org>
Permalink:  ../20011001233901.M77860-100000@mail1.hub.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20011001233901.M77860-100000@mail1.hub.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: scrappy@hub.org, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, lockhart@fourpalms.org, vev@michvhf.com
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes
  In-Reply-To: <20011001233901.M77860-100000@mail1.hub.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox