pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: <application> vs <command>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 18:09:26 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <200112052309.fB5N9RH20099@candle.pha.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111292149190.609-100000@peter.localdomain>

> Bruce Momjian writes:
> 
> > Can someone clarify when we should use <command> and when we should use
> > <application>?  I see postmaster used with application, but psql and
> > createdb used with command.  Is this correct?
> 
> >From "DocBook: The Definitive Guide":
> 
> | Command -- The name of an executable program or other software command
> |
> | This element holds the name of an executable program or the text of a
> | command that a user enters to execute a program.
> 
> | Application -- The name of a software program
> |
> | The appelation "application" is usually reserved for larger software
> | packages--WordPerfect, for example, but not grep. In some domains,
> | Application may also apply to a piece of hardware.
> 
> One could think of psql as a separate "application", but postmaster is
> certainly a command only.
> 
> I'm not sure why, given the definition, <command> is put out in bold.
> Monospaced would make more sense to me.  <application> could be a remote
> candidate for bold.

I see both <command> and <application> SGML tags is used for the
following items in our current CVS:
		
	createdb
	cvs checkout
	ecpg
	gcc
	gzip
	initdb
	pg_dumpall
	pgtclsh
	postmaster
	ps
	psql
	sed
	ssh
	strace
	sysctl
	tcsh

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026



view thread (7+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <200112052309.fB5N9RH20099@candle.pha.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../200112052309.fB5N9RH20099@candle.pha.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/200112052309.fB5N9RH20099@candle.pha.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, peter_e@gmx.net
  Subject: Re: <application> vs <command>
  In-Reply-To: <200112052309.fB5N9RH20099@candle.pha.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox