From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Use of SGML vs. LaTeX
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 19:24:33 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <200203210024.g2L0OXW14900@candle.pha.pa.us> (raw)
There was an interesting discussion on Slashdot today related to TeXmacs
and the use of SGML vs. LaTeX for document preparation. I think the
best part was this:
Sure, with Docbook, you don't have to worry about it -- not because it
does it Right, but because you can't worry about it by design. The
result of using a perfectly abstract system like that, is that you just
take what comes out, regardless of whether or not it's what you want.
Changing the layout that Docbook generates is exceedingly painful -- and
the tradeoff you make when you go to a perfect structural definition
like that, is a cleaner document in exchange for a layout that is
signifigantly harder to alter.
The tradeoff is simply not worth it for alot of things. For documents
whose existance matters more than thier presentation (Docbook is ideal
for maintaining documentation -- because it hardly ever matters how
documentation is presented, as long as it's there), a perfectly
structural layout system is great.
But for writing an APA-publication-guide-compliant paper for a
Psychology course, anything that doesn't give you precise physical
control over the document is exceedingly painful. (Yes, you can write an
Docbook-LaTeX template that will handle everything -- but one doesn't
exist, and it would be exceedingly painful to do for 99.9% of the
population. And a long weekend project for the other 0.1%. And there's
that tradeoff -- you give up easy physical control in exchange for
perfect structural definition).
The fill thread is:
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=29766&cid=3195358
and
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=29766&cid=3195250
The full discussion is at:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/03/20/1755256&mode=nested&tid=117
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us
Subject: Re: Use of SGML vs. LaTeX
In-Reply-To: <200203210024.g2L0OXW14900@candle.pha.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox