From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume.lelarge@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: French PDF manual
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:16:19 +0200
Message-ID: <200605091416.20609.peter_e@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060509114000.GA9280@surnet.cl>
References: <4459A4BC.7060809@gmail.com>
<200605091150.33894.peter_e@gmx.net>
<20060509114000.GA9280@surnet.cl>
Am Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 13:40 schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
> I have a counter-question. What value is there in continuing to use
> SGML?
Tag reduction makes editing easier (for some).
There's the question whether all the files should be renamed to .xml.
Marked sections would need to be replaced with a profiling mechanism. The
mechanisms for this exist but they are not all that elegant.
I'm all in favor of considering a move to XML, but we need to work with the
facts.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: peter_e@gmx.net, alvherre@commandprompt.com, guillaume.lelarge@gmail.com
Subject: Re: French PDF manual
In-Reply-To: <200605091416.20609.peter_e@gmx.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox