From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: josh@agliodbs.com
Subject: Re: Suggested changes to Tutorial
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:08:09 +0200
Message-ID: <200608011008.10420.peter_e@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44CEA34B.8000209@commandprompt.com>
References: <200607311529.35214.josh@agliodbs.com>
<200607311711.12340.josh@agliodbs.com>
<44CEA34B.8000209@commandprompt.com>
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> I guess this comes back to.. why (really) haven't we switched to what
> is widely considered the documentation standard, which is Docbook
> XML.
Every time this is brought up for discussion, people come up with
irrelevant and incorrect arguments about this -- see last discussion a
few weeks ago. We need to see factual arguments about benefits.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: peter_e@gmx.net, jd@commandprompt.com, josh@agliodbs.com
Subject: Re: Suggested changes to Tutorial
In-Reply-To: <200608011008.10420.peter_e@gmx.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox