From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Patches <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Patch to update log levels
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:30:01 +0200
Message-ID: <20070921083001.GB14383@svr2.hagander.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46F31E1D.3040906@commandprompt.com>
References: <46F31362.1080301@commandprompt.com>
<17733.1190336531@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<46F319EF.40301@commandprompt.com>
<46F31E1D.3040906@commandprompt.com>
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 06:27:57PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> >>> Here is a patch that documents the syslog log levels and their
> >>> correlation to the PostgreSQL log levels per:
> >> This seems like quite the wrong place to document it --- I'd have
> >> thought somewhere near the discussion of syslog logging would be
> >> appropriate. Putting it here means you're in the face of people
> >> who do not even have syslog (ie, Windows users)
> >
> > Fair enough. Except that we don't really talk about syslog anywhere. We
> > do here:
> >
> > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/runtime-config-logging.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-LOGGING-W...
> >
> > Which is pretty much where I put it.
> >
> > Do we have some kind of correlation for eventlog on windows? Then I
> > could just use a table to show the relationships. Something like:
> >
>
> Is this correct for Windows?
>
> 1392 switch (level)
> 1393 {
> 1394 case DEBUG5:
> 1395 case DEBUG4:
> 1396 case DEBUG3:
> 1397 case DEBUG2:
> 1398 case DEBUG1:
> 1399 case LOG:
> 1400 case COMMERROR:
> 1401 case INFO:
> 1402 case NOTICE:
> 1403 eventlevel = EVENTLOG_INFORMATION_TYPE;
> 1404 break;
> 1405 case WARNING:
> 1406 eventlevel = EVENTLOG_WARNING_TYPE;
> 1407 break;
> 1408 case ERROR:
> 1409 case FATAL:
> 1410 case PANIC:
> 1411 default:
> 1412 eventlevel = EVENTLOG_ERROR_TYPE;
> 1413 break;
> 1414 }
Yes.
//Magnus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: magnus@hagander.net, jd@commandprompt.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Patch to update log levels
In-Reply-To: <20070921083001.GB14383@svr2.hagander.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox