From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Another small patch...
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 13:58:13 -0400
Message-ID: <20071006175813.GH7190@alvh.no-ip.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071006174858.GG7190@alvh.no-ip.org>
References: <4707BFBE.7060203@lelarge.info>
<20071006174858.GG7190@alvh.no-ip.org>
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> > ... this time, for maintenance.sgml.
>
> Applied, thanks. I'm wondering whether this should be
>
> <para>
> ! <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>'s
> ! <xref linkend="sql-vacuum" endterm="sql-vacuum-title"> command has to run on
> ! a regular basis for several reasons:
>
> instead. I didn't try to compile it so maybe the output is not OK.
OK, I need opinions on this issue. We currently have output that looks
like
"PostgreSQL's Vacuum (/Section 10.4.2/) command has to run ..."
(the part between // is a clickable link)
but with the patch above, it would show up as
"PostgreSQL's /Vacuum/ command has to run ..."
Is there a preferred way to link? I notice there is plenty of usage of
both forms.
I wonder what does printed output look like? Does it just just lose the
reference?
--
Alvaro Herrera Developer, http://www.PostgreSQL.org/
Al principio era UNIX, y UNIX habló y dijo: "Hello world\n".
No dijo "Hello New Jersey\n", ni "Hello USA\n".
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@commandprompt.com, guillaume@lelarge.info
Subject: Re: Another small patch...
In-Reply-To: <20071006175813.GH7190@alvh.no-ip.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox