pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Use of "postmaster"
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 21:28:48 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <200710090128.l991Smk16058@momjian.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37ed240d0710031654m3f4ade9di4f0dfa87f21e8084@mail.gmail.com>


Patch applied.  Thanks.  Your documentation changes can be viewed on our
web site shortly.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Brendan Jurd wrote:
> On 10/4/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > "Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com> writes:
> > > Now that we've renamed the server binary to "postgres", what is the
> > > status on use of the name "postmaster"?  Is it now deprecated?  And if
> > > not, is there any point in keeping it around?
> >
> > We should replace it by terms like "server" in contexts where it's
> > not actually important to the reader which process is involved,
> > but I think Peter's hit most of them already ...
> 
> Looks like Peter got the sgml sources pretty well cleaned up, but
> didn't touch the FAQs.
> 
> The attached patch replaces some more references to "postmaster" in
> the FAQs.  Per Tom's guidance, I only replaced those references where
> I felt a distinction between the postmaster and its children wasn't
> important to the reader.
> 
> Thanks for your time,
> BJ

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +



view thread (5+ messages)

Message-ID: <200710090128.l991Smk16058@momjian.us>
Permalink:  ../200710090128.l991Smk16058@momjian.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/200710090128.l991Smk16058@momjian.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: bruce@momjian.us, direvus@gmail.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Use of "postmaster"
  In-Reply-To: <200710090128.l991Smk16058@momjian.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox