From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Mentioning Slony in docs
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 10:28:34 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <200711081528.lA8FSYN05094@momjian.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24570.1194535368@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > My understanding was that we were trying to show equal favour to all of
> > the various solutions. This was a reason not to do that.
>
> The reason for taking a "balanced approach" is that no one solution
> fits everyone's needs. I don't think the core docs should be pushing
> Slony more than other solutions.
We do mention Slony for in-place upgrades because if its capabilities to
work across Postgres versions.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: bruce@momjian.us, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, simon@2ndquadrant.com, peter_e@gmx.net
Subject: Re: Mentioning Slony in docs
In-Reply-To: <200711081528.lA8FSYN05094@momjian.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox