From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:48:30 -0800
Message-ID: <20080305094830.1082378e@jd-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080305174126.GM19860@fetter.org>
References: <200803051502.m25F2fm03349@momjian.us>
<718.1204738553@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20080305174126.GM19860@fetter.org>
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:41:26 -0800
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> Stopping there seems like a very bad idea from a public relations
> point of view. Making the suggestion generic and naming several FLOSS
> DBs as an alternative might work better.
IMO, entries last forever, for years and years even after we fix them.
I believe we should make reference that PostgreSQL is not generally
considered an embeddable platform and call it good.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 188B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, david@fetter.org, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, bruce@momjian.us, dev@archonet.com
Subject: Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
In-Reply-To: <20080305094830.1082378e@jd-laptop>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox