public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Smith <[email protected]>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] bgwriter_lru_multiplier blurbs inconsistent
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:32:03 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Smith <[email protected]> writes:
> > On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I think the main problem is the qualifying clause up front in a place
> >> of prominence.  Here's a V3 try
> 
> > That one looks good to me.  These are small details but better to get it 
> > right now.
> 
> OK, committed.  Back to Alvaro's original concern: is the short
> description in guc.c all right, or can we improve that?

I have tried to improve the GUC description for
"bgwriter_lru_multiplier";  applied to CVS HEAD.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <[email protected]>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


Attachments:

  [text/x-diff] /rtmp/diff (777B, 2-%2Frtmp%2Fdiff)
  download | inline diff:
Index: src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.432
diff -c -c -r1.432 guc.c
*** src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c	30 Jan 2008 18:35:55 -0000	1.432
--- src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c	6 Mar 2008 16:22:44 -0000
***************
*** 1841,1847 ****
  
  	{
  		{"bgwriter_lru_multiplier", PGC_SIGHUP, RESOURCES,
! 			gettext_noop("Background writer multiplier on average buffers to scan per round."),
  			NULL
  		},
  		&bgwriter_lru_multiplier,
--- 1841,1847 ----
  
  	{
  		{"bgwriter_lru_multiplier", PGC_SIGHUP, RESOURCES,
! 			gettext_noop("Multiple of the average buffer usage to free per round."),
  			NULL
  		},
  		&bgwriter_lru_multiplier,


view thread (7+ messages)

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] bgwriter_lru_multiplier blurbs inconsistent
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox