pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ross J. Reedstrom <reedstrm@rice.edu>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
Cc: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sync rep doc corrections
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 13:01:05 -0600
Message-ID: <20110307190105.GB21734@rice.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1299523373-sup-3966@alvh.no-ip.org>
References: <AANLkTikUBhskJ8ALpr=KBc66toJ1CvmupTJFgaTXwc-d@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimE9vAC1Xb1Ge4weFJ4unExzsAUExFwk=L2NvVX@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimWR2MXBqi-Ann2EYAyOmDNYXMOseNKoMmsq9tD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimPJ+SczkQd-7_kWQyrDvtrFYSXcmCfU74oZs1Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110307175106.GA12122@fetter.org>
	<AANLkTi=posYheJ5PS1FwOJmMKX93WKG_KRKYE2BoCeEw@mail.gmail.com>
	<9160.1299521791@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<1299523373-sup-3966@alvh.no-ip.org>

On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:45:17PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun mar 07 15:16:31 -0300 2011:
> 
> > If we do that then it becomes worth wondering what the -docs list is for
> > at all.  Maybe we *should* get rid of it; I dunno.  I see your point
> > about how the factual issues involved in a docs change ought to be
> > vetted on -hackers, but on the other hand the traffic on -hackers is so
> > high already that I'm not happy about folding another list with a
> > reasonably distinct charter into it.
> 
> Searching for doc changes/suggestions is helped tremendously by having
> them in a separate list.  -1 for merging it with -hackers.  I have no
> opinion on the -hackers crossposting issue as it doesn't affect me at
> all.

Definitely don't merge. Crossposting, I think, should be reserved for
significant factual changes to docs of features that are in current
development, like ... syncrep. :-) Basically, keep docs work on docs,
but cross-post to hackers when a cross-check is needed. Don't routinely
crosspost, lest that train hackers to ignore the docs posts. After all,
we insist that developers of patches submit docs: correct documentation
is a valid concern for all developers. 

Ross
P.S. Everyone is aware of the settings for majordomo, so you only get
one of any crosspost, right?
-- 
Ross Reedstrom, Ph.D.                                 reedstrm@rice.edu
Systems Engineer & Admin, Research Scientist        phone: 713-348-6166
Connexions                  http://cnx.org            fax: 713-348-3665
Rice University MS-375, Houston, TX 77005
GPG Key fingerprint = F023 82C8 9B0E 2CC6 0D8E  F888 D3AE 810E 88F0 BEDE



view thread (18+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20110307190105.GB21734@rice.edu>
Permalink:  ../20110307190105.GB21734@rice.edu/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20110307190105.GB21734@rice.edu

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: reedstrm@rice.edu, alvherre@commandprompt.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, thom@linux.com, david@fetter.org, robertmhaas@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sync rep doc corrections
  In-Reply-To: <20110307190105.GB21734@rice.edu>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox