pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: sabrina.iqbal@target.com
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Use of term Master/Slave
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 15:53:01 -0400
Message-ID: <20170801195301.yqyzifsxv7zq23gp@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANP8+j+i2z6iCfosgR0CswM-uN5ffQZSVKdeuNs9-vVsfh0_8w@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-docs>

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 31 July 2017 at 22:13,  <sabrina.iqbal@target.com> wrote:
> > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> >
> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/release-9-6.html
> > Description:
> >
> > Wondering why PostgreSQL still uses the terms master and slave when there
> > are other terms like primary/secondary that can be used in the same manner.
> 
> Do you think primary/secondary is more descriptive?

I think "primary" is fine, but "secondary" isn't.

> I started using the terms Primary and Secondary in the original use,
> but I think we've moved away from that towards Master/Standby, which
> fits better with a world where "muti-master" is a frequently used term
> and an eventual goal in core. Multi-primary doesn't seem to make much
> sense.

Elsewhere we've started using the terms "origin" and "replica".
"Multi-origin" sounds sensible enough to me whereas "multi-primary"
doesn't.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs



view thread (11+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20170801195301.yqyzifsxv7zq23gp@alvherre.pgsql>
Permalink:  ../20170801195301.yqyzifsxv7zq23gp@alvherre.pgsql/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20170801195301.yqyzifsxv7zq23gp@alvherre.pgsql

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, simon@2ndquadrant.com, sabrina.iqbal@target.com
  Subject: Re: Use of term Master/Slave
  In-Reply-To: <20170801195301.yqyzifsxv7zq23gp@alvherre.pgsql>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox