From: theconor@gmail.com
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: intarray - benefits over regular int[]?
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 19:33:04 +0000
Message-ID: <20170821193304.1455.88659@wrigleys.postgresql.org> (raw)
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-docs>
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/intarray.html
Description:
Would it be possible for the intarray documentation to describe its benefits
over regular int[]?
At the moment I am a little unclear whether intarray is effectively a
deprecated module, or if it can still provide some distinct advantages -
e.g. performance, features or just a handy syntax -- for new projects too?
Thanks for any clarifications that can be given.
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: theconor@gmail.com
Subject: Re: intarray - benefits over regular int[]?
In-Reply-To: <20170821193304.1455.88659@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox