public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
To: Theo Kramer <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Section 26.2.1. Planning wording
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:54:43 -0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 08:38:02AM +0200, Theo Kramer wrote:
> Section 26.2.1. Planning wording includes the following
>
> "In any case the hardware architecture must be the same — shipping from, say, a 32-bit to a 64-bit system will not work."
>
> would be more correct if it read as follows
>
> "In any case the CPU architecture must be the same — shipping from, say, a 32-bit to a 64-bit system will not work."
>
> as “hardware architecture” would imply the difference between say Dell and IBM which should be ok if the CPU is the same architecture ...
I feel we might have cases where differences beyond the CPU might
matter, though I can't think of any now.
--
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
view thread (2+ messages)
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Section 26.2.1. Planning wording
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox