public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Section 26.2.1. Planning wording
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* Section 26.2.1. Planning wording
@ 2018-11-20 06:38  Theo Kramer <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread

From: Theo Kramer @ 2018-11-20 06:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: [email protected]

Section 26.2.1. Planning wording includes the following

"In any case the hardware architecture must be the same — shipping from, say, a 32-bit to a 64-bit system will not work."

would  be more correct if it read as follows

"In any case the CPU architecture must be the same — shipping from, say, a 32-bit to a 64-bit system will not work."

as “hardware architecture” would imply the difference between say Dell and IBM which should be ok if the CPU is the same architecture ...

-- 
Regards
Theo Kramer




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Section 26.2.1. Planning wording
@ 2018-11-27 01:54  Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
  parent: Theo Kramer <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread

From: Bruce Momjian @ 2018-11-27 01:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Theo Kramer <[email protected]>; +Cc: [email protected]

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 08:38:02AM +0200, Theo Kramer wrote:
> Section 26.2.1. Planning wording includes the following
> 
> "In any case the hardware architecture must be the same — shipping from, say, a 32-bit to a 64-bit system will not work."
> 
> would  be more correct if it read as follows
> 
> "In any case the CPU architecture must be the same — shipping from, say, a 32-bit to a 64-bit system will not work."
> 
> as “hardware architecture” would imply the difference between say Dell and IBM which should be ok if the CPU is the same architecture ...

I feel we might have cases where differences beyond the CPU might
matter, though I can't think of any now.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <[email protected]>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-27 01:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-11-20 06:38 Section 26.2.1. Planning wording Theo Kramer <[email protected]>
2018-11-27 01:54 ` Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox