From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: egashira.yusuke@jp.fujitsu.com
To: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Is it typo of connection_name?
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:49:14 +0900
Message-ID: <20190918014914.GJ8909@paquier.xyz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <156870956796.1259.11456186889345212399@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
References: <156870956796.1259.11456186889345212399@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:39:27AM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The "connection_name" parameter's explanation is not in Parameters
> section.
> Instead of it, "connection_object" parameter is in Parameters section. Its
> explanation seems about "connection_name".
> Is it typo about "connection_name" in Synopsis section, or
> "connection_object" in Parameters section?
Good catch. If you look at the code (ecpg.trailer), connection_object
refers to the name of the parameter, while connection_name refers to
"AS connection_object" as a whole. So it seems to me that the
intention is to use connection_object in the synopsis of the docs.
Any thoughts from others?
--
Michael
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: michael@paquier.xyz, egashira.yusuke@jp.fujitsu.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Is it typo of connection_name?
In-Reply-To: <20190918014914.GJ8909@paquier.xyz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox