pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: protodef@gmail.com
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: optionally schema-qualified for table_name
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 21:27:57 -0400
Message-ID: <20200323012757.GC2031@momjian.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4628.1584915604@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <158399268229.5708.13296960177949398026@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
	<20200322001310.GA2031@momjian.us>
	<22707.1584903901@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20200322201518.GB2031@momjian.us>
	<4628.1584915604@sss.pgh.pa.us>

On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 06:20:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 03:05:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I don't really think this is an improvement, mainly because that
> >> error message is inventing a notation that we do not use in any
> >> other error message.
> 
> > What do you suggest?  The current message is:
> 
> > 	Specify OWNED BY table.column or OWNED BY NONE.
> 
> Yeah, and I think that's okay as-is, or at least we can't make it better
> without fairly whole-sale changes of our documentation practices.
> The fact that a table name can be schema-qualified is usually implicit,
> and I don't see why this place cries out for making it explicit
> more than other places.  You could as well complain that there's
> nothing explicit here about double-quoting practices.

OK, I will do just the documentation patch for this then.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +





view thread (10+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20200323012757.GC2031@momjian.us>
Permalink:  ../20200323012757.GC2031@momjian.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20200323012757.GC2031@momjian.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: bruce@momjian.us, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, protodef@gmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: optionally schema-qualified for table_name
  In-Reply-To: <20200323012757.GC2031@momjian.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox