pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: chris+postgresql@qwirx.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Subject: Re: Logical replication subscription owner
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 21:47:34 -0400
Message-ID: <20200508014734.GA3552@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200423113155.GC13712@tamriel.snowman.net>

I'd welcome input from other people on this issue; only now I noticed
that it's buried in pgsql-docs, so CCing pgsql-hackers now.


On 2020-Apr-23, Stephen Frost wrote:

> Greetings,
> 
> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > > I had it in my mind that LOGIN was for regular (SQL-based) login, and
> > > REPLICATION was for replication login, and that they were orthogonal.
> > 
> > Yeah, that's what I would've expected.  Otherwise, is REPLICATION
> > without LOGIN useful at all?
> 
> No, but it's less surprising, at least to me, for all roles that login
> to require having the LOGIN right.  Having REPLICATION ignore that would
> be surprising (and a change from today).  Maybe if we called it
> REPLICATIONLOGIN or something along those lines it would be less
> surprising, but it still seems pretty awkward.
> 
> I view REPLICATION as allowing a specific kind of connection, but you
> first need to be able to login.
> 
> Also- what about per-database connections?  Does having REPLICATION mean
> you get to override the CONNECT privileges on a database, if you're
> connecting for the purposes of doing logical replication?
> 
> I agree we could do better in these areas, but I'd argue that's mostly
> around improving the documentation rather than baking in implications
> that one privilege implies another.  We certainly get people who
> complain about getting a permission denied error when they have UPDATE
> rights on a table (but not SELECT) and they include a WHERE clause in
> their update statement, but that doesn't mean we should assume that
> having UPDATE rights means you also get SELECT rights, just because
> UPDATE is next to useless without SELECT.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stephen




-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services





view thread (15+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20200508014734.GA3552@alvherre.pgsql>
Permalink:  ../20200508014734.GA3552@alvherre.pgsql/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20200508014734.GA3552@alvherre.pgsql

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, sfrost@snowman.net, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com
  Subject: Re: Logical replication subscription owner
  In-Reply-To: <20200508014734.GA3552@alvherre.pgsql>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox